After building 50+ automation projects across all three platforms, I have strong opinions about when to use each one.

Here’s the honest breakdown—not a feature checklist, but practical guidance based on real implementations.

The Quick Answer

ChooseIf You Are…
ZapierNon-technical, need quick wins, budget isn’t a concern
MakeVisual thinker, moderate complexity, want value for money
n8nTechnical, need full control, cost-conscious at scale

But let’s go deeper.

Pricing: Where the Real Differences Show

This is where most comparisons fail. They show the pricing pages but not what it actually costs to run real workflows.

Zapier Pricing (2025)

  • Free: 100 tasks/month
  • Starter: $29.99/month for 750 tasks
  • Professional: $73.50/month for 2,000 tasks
  • Team: $103.50/month for 2,000 tasks + team features

The catch: Every action in a workflow counts as a task. A 5-step workflow triggered 100 times = 500 tasks.

Make Pricing

  • Free: 1,000 operations/month
  • Core: $10.59/month for 10,000 operations
  • Pro: $18.82/month for 10,000 operations + features

Better value for complex workflows since operations are more granular.

n8n Pricing

  • Self-hosted: Free (unlimited)
  • Cloud Starter: $24/month for 2,500 executions
  • Cloud Pro: $60/month for 10,000 executions

The winner: Self-hosted n8n. I run complex automations for clients at $5-15/month in server costs with unlimited executions.

Real Cost Comparison

For a workflow that processes 1,000 leads/month with 5 steps each:

PlatformMonthly Cost
Zapier~$200/month (Professional)
Make~$20/month (Core)
n8n Cloud~$24/month
n8n Self-hosted~$10/month

At scale, this adds up fast.

Integration Count vs. Integration Quality

Zapier loves to brag about 6,500+ integrations. Here’s why that number is misleading:

What Actually Matters

  • Zapier: 6,500+ apps, but many are shallow (basic triggers/actions only)
  • Make: 2,000+ apps with deeper functionality per integration
  • n8n: 400+ native + HTTP node for anything with an API

The HTTP node in n8n is the great equalizer. If a service has an API, you can connect it—no waiting for an official integration.

My Experience

In 80% of client projects, the apps needed are available on all three platforms. For the other 20%, n8n’s flexibility wins because I can build custom integrations.

Technical Flexibility

This is where the platforms truly diverge.

Zapier: The Guardrails Are Features

Zapier intentionally limits complexity. This is good if you want simplicity, bad if you need power:

  • Limited conditional logic (Paths are basic)
  • No loops or iterations (without workarounds)
  • Cannot write custom code (only formatter functions)
  • Single trigger per Zap

Make: The Middle Ground

Make offers visual power with reasonable flexibility:

  • Complex routing and filters
  • Array handling and iterations
  • Basic scripting capability
  • Multiple triggers possible

n8n: Developer-First

n8n assumes you might want to write code:

// Example: Custom lead scoring in n8n
const score = items.map(item => {
  let points = 0;

  if (item.json.company_size > 50) points += 20;
  if (item.json.industry === 'SaaS') points += 15;
  if (item.json.source === 'demo_request') points += 30;

  return {
    json: {
      ...item.json,
      lead_score: points,
      priority: points > 50 ? 'high' : 'normal'
    }
  };
});

return score;
  • Full JavaScript/Python support
  • NPM packages available
  • Self-hostable with custom nodes
  • Complex data transformations native

Error Handling: The Unsexy Difference

Here’s something most comparisons skip: what happens when things break?

Zapier

  • Basic retry logic
  • Email notifications
  • Limited debugging (can’t see intermediate data easily)
  • No way to manually reprocess failed runs

Make

  • Automatic retries with backoff
  • Error routes (can build recovery logic)
  • Better debugging with data inspection
  • Can rerun failed scenarios

n8n

  • Full error workflows (separate error handling paths)
  • Manual execution for testing
  • Complete data visibility at every node
  • Can pause and resume workflows
  • Self-healing patterns possible

For production workflows, error handling matters more than features.

When to Choose Each Platform

Choose Zapier If:

  1. You’re not technical and don’t want to be
  2. Speed matters more than cost (quick setup wins)
  3. Simple workflows only (under 5 steps)
  4. Enterprise compliance is required (SOC 2, etc.)
  5. You value support over flexibility

Best Zapier use case: Marketing team connecting HubSpot → Slack notifications.

Choose Make If:

  1. Visual thinking is your strength
  2. Moderate complexity workflows (10-20 steps)
  3. Budget-conscious but need more than Zapier
  4. Data transformation is important
  5. Team collaboration on workflows

Best Make use case: E-commerce order processing with conditional routing.

Choose n8n If:

  1. You’re technical or have developer resources
  2. Complex workflows with custom logic
  3. Cost at scale is a factor
  4. Self-hosting is preferred (data privacy)
  5. AI/LLM integrations are needed
  6. Custom integrations are likely

Best n8n use case: AI-powered lead processing with custom scoring and routing.

My Honest Recommendation

For most businesses starting out: Begin with Make. It’s the best balance of power, price, and usability.

For technical founders and agencies: Use n8n. The initial learning curve pays dividends in flexibility and cost savings.

For enterprise teams with compliance requirements: Zapier’s enterprise features and support justify the premium.

What I use: n8n for 90% of projects. The ability to write code when needed and self-host for cost savings makes it my go-to.

Migration Considerations

Already on one platform? Here’s the migration reality:

FromToDifficulty
Zapier → MakeEasy (similar concepts)
Zapier → n8nMedium (need to learn nodes)
Make → n8nEasy (visual concepts transfer)
n8n → ZapierHard (lose functionality)

The Bottom Line

There’s no universally “best” platform. The right choice depends on:

  1. Your technical comfort level
  2. Workflow complexity
  3. Budget constraints
  4. Scale requirements
  5. Team capabilities

For automation consulting clients, I typically recommend:

  • Zapier for quick wins under $50/month
  • Make for growing teams with moderate needs
  • n8n for anything AI-powered or high-volume

Need help choosing or migrating? Book a free consultation and I’ll recommend the right platform for your specific needs.

Sources